Politics Business Culture Technology Environment Travel World
Home Culture Feature
Culture · Exclusive

Netflix faces $105m lawsuit over stolen hard drive with unreleased Nicolas Cage film

Netflix faces $105m lawsuit over stolen hard drive with unreleased Nicolas Cage film
Culture · 2026
Photo · Tomas Horak for European Pulse
By Tomas Horak Culture & Lifestyle Jul 31, 2026 3 min read

A production company has filed a $105 million lawsuit against Netflix, alleging that the streaming giant's mishandling of a hard drive containing an unreleased Nicolas Cage World War II thriller has compromised the film's commercial prospects. The suit, lodged in a California federal court by writer-producer Simon Afram and his company Op-Fortitude, centers on the theft of several hard drives from Netflix's Los Angeles offices last month.

According to the complaint, an encrypted copy of Fortitude was among the stolen drives. The film, directed by Simon West (Con Air, Lara Croft: Tomb Raider) and starring Matthew Goode, Michael Sheen, and Ben Kingsley, is based on the true story of British intelligence officers who devised elaborate deceptions to mislead Nazi leadership during the war. Afram says he spent seven years bringing the story to the screen.

The lawsuit alleges that Netflix failed to adequately protect the material and was dismissive after the theft. It quotes an email from Sean Berney, Netflix's head of film acquisitions, dated 25 June, in which he wrote: "Unfortunately, someone stole a good amount of drives from our office desks this past week. We've been working through this with our security teams to no luck. Our piracy teams are on high alert with the breach and will monitor."

Op-Fortitude claims that the loss has put any future sale of the film in jeopardy, undermining an investment of over $45 million. The suit also criticizes Netflix for not disclosing whether a police report was filed. "Through its mishandling of the film and subsequent dismissiveness, Netflix has jeopardized plaintiffs' investment and the significant value of the film itself," the complaint states.

Netflix's response

Netflix has strongly denied the allegations. In a statement to The Hollywood Reporter, a spokesperson said: "Netflix disputes any claim that it bears the risk of loss for a film delivered without the proper industry-standard safeguards. While we do not own the rights to Fortitude, we take content security seriously and have taken extra measures to support the filmmaker and his team. This includes conducting a thorough investigation and offering to monitor known piracy sites for any unauthorized distribution or sale."

The case raises broader questions about liability in the entertainment industry, particularly as streaming platforms increasingly handle physical media for screenings. The theft occurred amid a period of heightened security concerns across the sector, with studios and distributors grappling with the risks of digital piracy and physical breaches.

For Afram, the stakes are personal. "I spent seven years of my life bringing this incredible true story to the screen," he said in a statement. "But this film was never mine alone. It belongs to the extraordinary cast and their performances of a lifetime that deserve to be seen and recognized. It represents the moment these artists have earned."

The lawsuit also highlights the growing importance of content security in an era where streaming services hold vast libraries of unreleased material. While the theft occurred in Los Angeles, the implications resonate globally, including in Europe, where many productions are financed and distributed. The case could set a precedent for how streaming platforms handle physical media and their responsibility for safeguarding filmmakers' work.

As the legal battle unfolds, the film's future remains uncertain. Fortitude has yet to secure a distributor, and the theft may complicate negotiations. The case is a reminder that even in the digital age, a single lost hard drive can have outsized consequences.

More from this story

Next article · Don't miss

Iceland's EU referendum: fishing, farming, and the pull of Brussels

Iceland holds a referendum on August 29 on whether to resume EU membership negotiations, suspended since 2013. The vote exposes deep divisions between rural Eurosceptics and urban pro-Europeans, with fishing and farming at the heart of the debate.

Read the story →
Iceland's EU referendum: fishing, farming, and the pull of Brussels