Politics Business Culture Technology Environment Travel World
Home Europe Feature
Europe · Exclusive

Azerbaijan bans under-16s from social media as global restrictions grow

Azerbaijan bans under-16s from social media as global restrictions grow
Europe · 2026
Photo · Anna Schroeder for European Pulse
By Anna Schroeder Brussels Bureau Chief Aug 19, 2026 4 min read

Azerbaijan has enacted legislation that prohibits children under 16 from using social media platforms, aligning with a growing international movement to curb minors' digital exposure. The law, passed in Baku, reflects mounting concerns among governments about the psychological and social effects of social media on young people.

Australia was the first country to implement a nationwide ban for under-16s, while France has tightened its digital consent laws, and the UK has introduced the Online Safety Bill. The European Union has also been increasing pressure on tech companies to protect minors. Now Azerbaijan is following suit, signaling a broader shift in how states view their role in regulating the digital sphere.

Psychological toll on teenagers

Social media addiction, self-esteem issues, and cyberbullying are causing documented psychological harm among adolescents. Unlike traditional bullying, online harassment follows children into their homes, making it harder to escape. Narmina Ismayilzada, a child and adolescent psychologist with 16 years of experience, told Euronews that teenagers exposed to digital bullying often develop "a very strong sense of shame, decreased self-confidence, and anxiety," leading to social isolation and school avoidance.

Ismayilzada supports state-level age restrictions but cautions that a ban alone will not solve the underlying problems. "Prohibiting something at this age can create reverse psychology," she said. "Children show more interest in what is prohibited and may try to use these things in hidden ways." She emphasized that parents need to explain the reasoning behind restrictions and build trust through open dialogue.

Algorithmic feeds, she noted, exploit adolescents' heightened sensitivity to physical appearance and social acceptance, damaging attention spans and academic motivation. "Concentration problems and divided attention are among our most serious issues today. It makes them more aggressive and impulsive," Ismayilzada said. "When children compare themselves to idealised images on social networks, it naturally leads to self-confidence problems, body-image dissatisfaction, and, in worst cases, depressive symptoms."

Teachers question the approach

From the classroom perspective, the debate looks different. Kamala Dadashova, an informatics and digital skills teacher at School No. 161 in Baku, acknowledged the real problems the ban addresses—peer comparison, "like" dependency, cyberbullying, and disrupted sleep—but questioned whether restriction alone is the right frame. "The aim should not be to distance children from the internet, but to prepare them to use it safely," she told Euronews. "In the 21st century, escaping the digital environment is impossible; the priority is making it safer."

Dadashova stressed that platforms themselves have an obligation to create safe environments for minors, rather than placing the entire burden on children or parents. She called for schools to focus on meaningful digital activities, such as programming, robotics, and media literacy clubs, to replace passive screen time. "While a social media ban can offer positive effects, the real solution lies in cultivating healthy digital behaviour and real-world communication skills," she explained.

Broader implications for digital governance

Laman Nazarova, a geopolitical analyst at the Caspian Analytical Centre, argued that the legislative push reflects a broader reassessment of what digital platforms actually do. "Platforms have become one of the main environments where children acquire language, values, and social norms," she said. These functions previously belonged to families and schools. "Governments have begun to recognise that digital platforms do not merely transmit information. They organise social experience, and they shape habits before beliefs, and attention before judgment."

Nazarova described recent legislation as an attempt by states to rebuild protective barriers around childhood that digital feeds had dismantled. "From this perspective, the proposed age limit in Azerbaijan reflects a transformation in the way states understand their role," she said.

The practical test of Azerbaijan's law, experts agree, will come after its adoption: whether the restrictions can be enforced in practice, and whether they are accompanied by the education and support structures needed to change behaviour rather than simply push it underground. As Europe's underwater frontier highlights, regulatory efforts often face implementation challenges. Similarly, the effectiveness of this ban will depend on how well it is integrated with broader digital literacy initiatives.

For now, Azerbaijan's move adds to a patchwork of national approaches across Europe and beyond. While some see it as a necessary step to protect children, others worry about unintended consequences. The debate is far from settled, but one thing is clear: the era of unregulated social media for minors is coming to an end.

More from this story

Next article · Don't miss

Belgian fry makers face shortage as heat shrinks potato harvest

Belgian potato farmers warn this year's harvest is too small to meet demand for the country's famous fries. Extreme heat and drought have left tubers the size of ping-pong balls, raising fears of tighter supplies and higher prices.

Read the story →
Belgian fry makers face shortage as heat shrinks potato harvest