The Visegrád Group—comprising the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia—has formally asked the European Commission to reconsider the pace and conditions of the bloc's planned phase-out of Russian energy imports. In a joint statement issued after their meeting in Prague, the four prime ministers argued that the current timeline and regulatory framework place an undue burden on member states still heavily reliant on Russian hydrocarbons.
The EU's broader strategy, agreed in response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, aims to eliminate Russian gas, oil, and coal imports by 2027. But the Visegrád leaders contend that the transition must account for differing national circumstances and the need to maintain affordable energy for households and industry. They are calling for more flexible implementation rules and additional EU funding to help manage the shift.
Electricity prices have surged across the continent, with eurozone inflation climbing to 3.8% largely due to energy costs. The Visegrád Four argue that a rigid approach could exacerbate social and economic strains, particularly in Central Europe where energy-intensive manufacturing remains a cornerstone of the economy.
“We cannot simply switch off Russian energy overnight without risking the competitiveness of our industries and the welfare of our citizens,” said Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala, who hosted the meeting. “We need a realistic pathway that combines solidarity with pragmatism.”
Divisions within the EU
The request highlights a growing rift between Western European capitals, which have pushed for swift and decisive action on Russian energy, and Central and Eastern European states that fear the economic fallout. While countries like Germany and France have invested heavily in alternative supplies and renewables, the Visegrád nations argue they lack the same financial cushion.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has been the most vocal critic of the phase-out, repeatedly warning that Brussels is moving too fast. Slovakia and the Czech Republic have also expressed concerns about the technical feasibility of replacing Russian gas, particularly for industrial use. Poland, though more hawkish on Russia, has joined its partners in seeking greater flexibility and funding.
The group's stance comes amid broader divisions over climate and energy policy, with the EU's carbon market reforms already sparking debate. The Visegrád Four argue that the energy transition must not be pursued at the expense of social cohesion or economic stability.
They are also seeking clarity on how the EU's proposed Sovereignty Fund—designed to support the green and digital transitions—will be allocated. The leaders want guarantees that Central European projects will receive adequate financing, rather than being overshadowed by larger Western economies.
Brussels' response
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has acknowledged the need for solidarity but has stopped short of endorsing a delay. In a recent address, she stressed that the 2027 target is essential for Europe's energy security and for undermining Russia's war effort. “Every day we continue to buy Russian energy, we are funding the bombs that fall on Ukrainian cities,” she said.
However, the Commission has indicated a willingness to discuss implementation details, including transition periods and financial support mechanisms. Energy Commissioner Kadri Simson is expected to meet with Visegrád energy ministers in the coming weeks to explore possible adjustments.
The debate also intersects with EU leaders' push for a joint response to the energy price surge. While some member states advocate for price caps and windfall taxes, the Visegrád Four are more focused on securing long-term supply contracts and infrastructure investments.
Analysts say the outcome of these negotiations will be critical for the EU's credibility. “The 2027 goal is ambitious, but it must be seen as achievable,” said Marta Prochaska, an energy policy expert at the Warsaw-based Centre for Eastern Studies. “If the Visegrád countries feel left behind, they may resist other EU initiatives, creating a deeper political rift.”
For now, the ball is in Brussels' court. The Visegrád Four have made their case, and the Commission must decide whether to adjust the rules or hold the line. The decision will not only shape Europe's energy future but also test the bloc's ability to balance solidarity with national interests.
